Maryland Criminal Defense · Baltimore City · Baltimore County · Statewide
Fentanyl prosecutions in Maryland are among the most aggressively pursued drug charges in the state. Even small quantities trigger mandatory minimum sentences. Allan Rombro defends all fentanyl charges — possession, distribution, trafficking, and federal conspiracies.
Tell us what happened — Allan responds personally.
🔒 Confidential & no obligation. Your information is never shared.
Maryland prosecutors have dramatically escalated their pursuit of fentanyl cases in response to the state’s overdose crisis. Unlike most drug charges, fentanyl can trigger mandatory minimum sentences — meaning the judge has little or no discretion to impose a lesser sentence, no matter the circumstances of your case.
Under Maryland law, possession of 5 grams or more of fentanyl can be charged as “possession of a large amount,” carrying a mandatory minimum 5 years in prison and up to a $100,000 fine — even for a first offense. Distribution and trafficking charges carry up to 20 years, doubled with a prior conviction.
What makes fentanyl cases uniquely dangerous is how the weight is measured. Maryland crime labs routinely weigh fentanyl including its packaging — not just the pure drug. This inflated gross weight can push a charge from simple possession into large-quantity territory. An experienced attorney who knows how to challenge the laboratory’s weight methodology can be the difference between a felony conviction and a dramatically reduced or dismissed charge.
The Law Offices of Allan Rombro have defended Marylanders facing serious drug charges for over 35 years — in Maryland Circuit Courts and Federal Court. If you are facing fentanyl charges, call immediately.
🔒 Confidential · No obligation
| Charge | Threshold | Sentence | Fine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple PossessionFelony | Any amount | Up to 4 years | Up to $25,000 |
| Possession of a Large AmountMandatory Min | 5+ grams | 5 years mandatory minimum / up to 20 years | Up to $100,000 |
| Distribution / PWIDFelony | Any amount | Up to 20 years (40 yrs with prior conviction) | Up to $20,000 |
| Trafficking / ImportationMandatory Min | 4+ grams | Up to 25 years | Up to $50,000 |
| Federal DistributionFederal Mandatory | 40+ grams | 5 years mandatory minimum / up to 40 years | Up to $5 million |
| Federal Trafficking (death/injury)Federal Mandatory | Any amount | 20 years mandatory minimum / up to life | Up to $8 million |
Even small amounts of fentanyl can result in a felony possession charge carrying up to 4 years in prison. Unlike some drug offenses, there is no misdemeanor possession category for fentanyl under Maryland law.
Under Maryland law, 5 grams or more of fentanyl triggers a "possession of a large amount" charge with a mandatory minimum 5-year prison sentence and up to a $100,000 fine. The weight calculation — including how labs weigh packaging — is frequently challengeable.
Prosecutors charge PWID based on quantity, packaging, the presence of scales or cash — not just evidence of an actual sale. PWID fentanyl is a serious felony. An experienced attorney can challenge whether the evidence actually supports the intent element.
Distribution of fentanyl carries up to 20 years in prison and a $20,000 fine. A prior drug conviction doubles the maximum to 40 years. Additional sentence enhancements apply if the distribution occurred near a school or involved a minor.
Maryland's importation statute (§ 5-614) is triggered by as little as 4 grams of fentanyl brought into the state — a threshold that catches many people by surprise. Trafficking carries up to 25 years and a $50,000 fine.
Federal prosecutors charge fentanyl conspiracies involving multiple defendants. Federal mandatory minimums for fentanyl begin at 5 years for 40 grams and escalate to life imprisonment if a death results. Allan Rombro has been admitted to U.S. District Court (D. Md.) since 1989.
GerrodAugust 17, 2025.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Allan handled the court process professionally from beginning to end. I had talked to other lawyers, but Allan was the only one who took action from the first consultation to getting my case dismissed. Would definitely use again and recommend to anyone seeking a professional, experienced lawyer! Elizabeth M.June 1, 2025.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. On more than one occasion Allan went above and beyond for our 16 yr old son! His knowledge of law, and respected seniority in Baltimore county courts shines through in every interaction with peers, judges, and clients. Our son is now succeeding in large part b/c of Allan’s work! We are more than grateful for Allan Rombro! Dana McGill-PecconMay 24, 2025.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. During their visit to Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, Allan & Ashley stopped into our store on Baltimore Avenue, Beaches~ The Green Truck Shop! Both Allan & Ashley were so sweet and personable to meet! They are upbeat, positive, and a delightful duo~ 😊 Monique GardnerMay 2, 2025.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I am a 100% disabled veteran and I reached out to Mr Rombro for his assistance and he was able to deliver immediately. I appreciate a lawyer with tons of knowledge. Thank you. Monique Beasley John CleeMarch 27, 2025.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I needed a lawyer for dui/dwi case. I did some research on google and Lawyer Allan Rombro caught my attention so I reached out to him. I suffer with severe anxiety and within the first couple minutes on the phone with Mr Rombro I was at ease and 100% confident that He was going to be my attorney. I am very pleased with the honesty and integrity that he showed and the outcome of my case couldn’t have had a better outcome. I would highly recommend Mr Rombro to anyone who needs representation. paul trontiJanuary 22, 2025.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I found/put myself in a situation that require an attorney that had experience on the in's and out's of the diabetic field, That could understand the situation I put myself in. I search for a lawyer for several weeks before i found Allan. When i had my first conversation with him, i knew he was the perfect lawyer for me. I am a very direct individual and during our conversation I found him to be the same. He does not beat around the bush and is very knowledgeable. He tells you like it is. That is what you want when you hire a lawyer, you want someone the is blunt and does not tell you what you want to hear to get the client. He got the charges against me dismissed and he gave me my life back. If you are ever in need of an attorney he is the one you want. Thank you Allan. Sincerely, Paul Tronti Charles NormanDecember 20, 2024.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. From the first time I called Allan I knew he'd be the lawyer for me. Him and Ashley slowed my thinking and explained everything to me. Allan knows exactly what he is doing. Allan was available to explain things every time I needed him to. Listen to him and he will get you the best possible outcome. In situations like this follow his timeline and not your own. You might want to get it over asap, which is understandable, but let Allan guide you and you won't be disappointed. He knows the system like the back of his hand. It helps that he is respected by prosecutors and judges. I saw this first hand when I was in court. I can't thank Allan enough for his help. It sucks that I'm only able to give him five stars because his services were worth way more than 5 stars! Thank you, Allan! Kelly HackerNovember 9, 2024.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I recently had the pleasure of working with Allan Rombro P.A. on a complex legal matter, and I couldn't be more satisfied with the experience. From our initial consultation to the final resolution, Mr. Rombro demonstrated exceptional professionalism, expertise, and dedication to our DUI case. Mr. Rombro possesses a deep understanding of DUI law and provided clear, concise explanations of our options and potential outcomes. His ability to break down complex legal jargon into understandable terms was incredibly helpful. Throughout the process, Mr. Rombro maintained excellent communication. He was always available to answer my questions, provide updates, and offer reassurance. His responsiveness and willingness to keep me informed made a significant difference in our overall experience. Mr. Rombro showed genuine care and concern for our case and was able accurately and quickly the many technical and procedural problems made by the arresting officer. Without those findings, our case could have taken a very different turn. Mr. Rombro and his law office went above and beyond to ensure that we felt supported and confident in the legal strategy we pursued. Their dedication to achieving the best possible outcome was evident right from the beginning and in every interaction. Thanks to Mr. Rombro's hard work and expertise, we achieved an outcome far greater than our expectations. We are incredibly grateful for his wisdom and the positive impact he had on our case. I highly recommend Mr. Rambro to anyone in need of legal assistance. His professionalism, knowledge, and commitment to their clients are truly outstanding. K. & K. Hacker ~Google rating score: 4.8 of 5, based on 113 reviews,showing only 4-5 star reviews
Because fentanyl is so potent, crime labs often test only a small sample of the recovered substance. Critically, labs frequently weigh fentanyl including its packaging — the bindle, baggie, or foil it came in — without separating the drug from the container before weighing.
Maryland law does not explicitly authorize the state to include packaging weight in meeting the statutory thresholds for large-quantity or trafficking charges. As a result, an experienced defense attorney can challenge whether the actual net weight of the fentanyl — without packaging — truly meets the statutory threshold required to trigger the mandatory minimum sentence.
This is not a technicality — it is a substantive legal defense that can mean the difference between a mandatory 5-year prison sentence and a charge that carries no mandatory minimum. It requires a lawyer who understands the laboratory methodology, knows how to cross-examine forensic scientists, and has the experience to press this argument effectively in a Maryland court.
Maryland labs weigh fentanyl including packaging. Because the statute does not explicitly authorize this, we can challenge the gross weight and argue the actual net drug weight falls below the statutory threshold — potentially eliminating mandatory minimum exposure entirely.
If police lacked a valid warrant, probable cause, or lawful consent to search, the fentanyl evidence may be suppressed under the Fourth Amendment. Without the evidence, the charge typically cannot stand. Allan Rombro has suppressed drug evidence for clients in Maryland courts for nearly 40 years.
Forensic testing of fentanyl must follow strict protocols. We scrutinize the methodology used — including whether the testing equipment was calibrated, whether chain of custody was maintained, and whether the test actually identified fentanyl rather than an analogue or cutting agent.
Prosecutors must prove intent to distribute — not just possession. We challenge the inference of distribution by showing quantity was consistent with personal use, the absence of distribution indicators like scales or pre-packaged units, and any other facts that undercut the state's narrative.
When trial is not the best path, Allan Rombro leverages his relationships with prosecutors and knowledge of Maryland courts to negotiate for reduced charges — from large-quantity possession down to simple possession, or from distribution down to PWID — eliminating mandatory minimum exposure.
Federal fentanyl cases are prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys with the resources of the DEA and FBI. Allan Rombro has been admitted to the U.S. District Court of Maryland since 1989 and brings genuine federal courtroom experience to these high-stakes cases.
Have a question not answered here? Email Allan Rombro directly for a free, confidential consultation — available 24 hours.
Under Maryland law, possession of 5 grams or more of fentanyl can trigger a “possession of a large amount” charge, which carries a mandatory minimum 5-year prison sentence and up to a $100,000 fine. Separately, Maryland’s importation statute is triggered by just 4 grams. Critically, crime labs often weigh the substance including packaging, which can inflate the measured weight — an experienced attorney can challenge whether the actual net weight of the drug meets the statutory threshold.
Yes — and this is often one of the most important defenses in a fentanyl case. Maryland crime labs frequently weigh fentanyl together with its packaging rather than separating the drug before weighing. Because Maryland law does not explicitly authorize inclusion of packaging weight, a skilled defense attorney can argue the actual net drug weight falls below the 5-gram threshold and challenge the mandatory minimum charge. This requires cross-examining forensic scientists and understanding laboratory methodology.
Distribution of fentanyl in Maryland carries up to 20 years in prison and a $20,000 fine for a first offense. A prior drug conviction can double that sentence to 40 years. Additional enhancements apply for distribution near a school or to a minor. Federal fentanyl charges carry different and often more severe mandatory minimums — 5 years mandatory for 40 grams, 10 years for 400 grams, and 20 years to life if a death results.
Yes. Allan Rombro has been admitted to the U.S. District Court of Maryland since 1989 and has extensive experience defending federal drug charges including fentanyl distribution, trafficking, and conspiracy cases prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Federal fentanyl cases involve the DEA, FBI, and mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines that differ significantly from state law — having a lawyer with genuine federal court experience matters enormously.
Yes. Defense strategies include challenging the legality of the search and seizure, disputing the lab testing methodology and chain of custody, challenging the weight calculation (including packaging), contesting the distribution element of PWID, and negotiating for a reduced charge. A successful suppression motion — showing police violated your Fourth Amendment rights — can result in the evidence being thrown out and the charges dismissed entirely. Every case depends on its specific facts.
The sooner you act, the stronger your defense. Free consultation, available 24 hours.
Speak directly with Allan Rombro. Available 24 hours.
🔒 Confidential & no obligation. Your information is never shared.